Sunday, 14 September 2008

Friday, 12 September 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Kockroach: A Novel (P.S.)
    By Tyler Knox
    see related

    What's up, you ask?

    Well...there's not a whole lot new going on at the time being.  I should hear something from the church I had the phone interview with in a week or so.  They were having the other candidate in last weekend or this weekend for an actual interview, so they said they would let me know what was going on when that was all through.  I've sent some other resumes as well to other churches, so we'll see what happens.

    Next weekend, I preach my second wedding.  This one is a bit more formal than the last one I did, and so it is taking a lot more work to put together.  I am pretty much done, though.  Just fine-tuning some things.

    That's about it really...

Tuesday, 09 September 2008

Sunday, 07 September 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Jesus for President: Politics for Ordinary Radicals
    By Shane Claiborne, Chris Haw
    see related

    A quote from "Jesus for President" by Shane Clairborne and Chris Haw

    Today the logic goes something like this: "Calling a ruler 'Son of God' is out of style.  No one really does that nowadays.  We can support a president while also worshiping Jesus as the Son of God."  But how is this possible?  For one says that we must love our enemies, and the other says we must kill them; one promotes the economics of competition, while the other admonishes the forgiveness of debts.  To which do we pledge allegiance?  Surely, one of them must have the wrong idea of how to move history.  Can a servant serve two masters?  To say that we must kill our enemies and join the popular project  to "rid the world of evil" is to call Jesus unrealistic.  And that is possible desirable for many; surely his ideas do not resonate with any common wisdom.  But can you call Jesus the Son of God and also say, "He just doesn't understand the world today?"  How ironic is it to see a bumper sticker that says "Jesus is the answer" next to a bumper sticker supporting the war in Iraq, as if to say, "Jesus is the answer - but not in the real world."  Remember, Jesus' followers were burned alive, beheaded, or fed to lions.  They knew evil and the "real world."  They would meet it face to face.  If there was anyone who tried to deal with evildoers and terrorists, it was certainly first-century Christians.

    When the church takes affairs of the state more seriously than they do Jesus, Pax Romana becomes its gospel and the president becomes the Son of God.  After all, what is the point in calling anything God if it does not also hold sway in every part of one's life...?
    (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.  2008.  166)

  • Currently Reading
    Jesus for President: Politics for Ordinary Radicals
    By Shane Claiborne, Chris Haw
    see related

    Fact-Checking and Faith First (by Jim Wallis)

    Friday, September 05, 2008

    John McCain's acceptance speech last night sought to present him as a maverick and bipartisan reformer, in contrast to the total partisanship of Sarah Palin the night before. She clearly relishes her own self-description as a pit bull with lipstick who fires up the conservative base, while McCain wants to reach out to the independents he knows he needs to win. He told his story again of how capture and torture took him from a reckless and selfish young man to a deep love for his country.

    As I suggested after the first presidential primary many months ago, "change" has already won this election, given the deep unpopularity of George Bush and the many failures of his administration. Change is the theme of both Barack Obama's campaign and of John McCain's. Usually when voters want change, they change parties in the White House. But McCain has the difficult task of persuading voters that a different kind of Republican can do the job, while Obama will continue to ask him to explain why he voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time.

    But now the conventions are over and the fact-checking can begin. There were a lot of very partisan things said at both conventions (that is the reason for conventions), but now all those things should be tested. I hope those who say that this will be an election about "personalities" are wrong. It must instead be about the real issues facing the country and the world. Whose tax policies will benefit whom the most? Who offers the best hopes for poor and middle-class families? And who has the smartest policies to defeat the real threats of terrorism -- not whose rhetoric against Islamic fundamentalism is tougher? So let the fact-checking begin, and given the speeches we have just heard from some politicians, we will need full-time fact-checkers.

    But one other thing bothered me last night, and it did also at the Democratic Convention. It was all those signs that read "Country First" and all those chants of "USA, USA, USA!!" The high-powered and, frankly, militaristic rhetoric kept telling us that "country" should be put above everything else -- including family and friendship. But what about faith? Should country be put ahead of faith, too? I kept wanting to yell back at the people yelling at me about putting the country first and say, "No, not me, I'm a Christian." Because we as Christians simply can't put our country first, ahead of God, ahead of Jesus Christ, ahead of the body of Christ (remember the worldwide body of Christ), and even family and friendship. Especially when our country is wrong, and when most of the rest of the body of Christ around the world thinks so.

    "Country First" was the theme of John McCain's speech and night, and he asked us to "fight with him." Barack Obama also said in Denver that all Americans must put country first -- to counter the Republican exclusive claim on patriotism. Well, again, not all of us. I suppose people running for president have to say that, but Christian voters shouldn't go along with that. Can anybody imagine Jesus leading cheers shouting "USA!"?

    This morning I spoke to the annual Wheaton, Illinois, prayer breakfast. I was driven there by a local Christian leader who spends his days serving poor women and children along with troubled teenagers. When he told me he was Canadian, even though he had lived in the U.S. for years, I asked him if Canadian Christians would respond to the call to put country first. "No," he said, we are "world Christians." What a good thought and what a clear sense of Christian identity. It was a great way to begin the day after two weeks of political conventions. So let the fact-checking and the radical assertion of "faith first" begin in this political campaign.

    Source: http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2008/09/fact-checking-and-faith-first.html

Saturday, 06 September 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Book 5)
    By J. K. Rowling, Mary GrandPré
    see related

    The Good Marriage: Closing Thoughts

    There are many many more topics that could be mentioned when discussing marriage, but I believe that we have laid a decent foundation.  Before I make some closing remarks about marriage, I would like to take some time and review what we have spoken about in the past few weeks. 

    Foundations in history

    Marriage is firmly grounded in the human story.  From the very beginning, our first parents were called to an early form of marriage.  God made man and woman for each other.  He intended marriage to be between men and women.  But marriage was not an institution until the time of John Calvin, when a civil/religious ceremony was imposed on the people.  Marriage has been in this form ever since.

    Foundations in Scripture

    As stated above, marriage began, in a sense, with Adam and Eve.  God created them for each other, and they entered into a monogamous relationship.  Little form for a marriage ceremony is found within the pages of the Christian Bible.  Tradition and history are the primary dictators of how the marriage ceremony is conducted.  But one thing is for sure: marriage is to be honored by all of humankind, and is intended to be a picture of Jesus and His relationship with the Church.  It is also the place where people are called to best portray the image of God inherent within the human race.

    Gender Roles

    One of the things that was messed up as a result of the fall was the harmony in the relationship between man and woman.  Man would seek to dominate woman, and woman would seek to dominate man.  Power sharing and equality were tossed out the window.  But, this is not how God intends for us to stay.  Within the marriage relationship people have the opportunity to, in a sense, reverse the curse of the fall.  Men and women can, once again, live in harmony with one another.  In fact, they are commanded to do so.  Husbands and wives are called to mutual submission and service.  Men are to give themselves up for women and women are to submit to men.  There is nowhere prescribed in Scripture an idea that women stay home, barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen.

    Sex

    A Christian philosophy of sex centers in the worship of God and in the gender equality mentioned above.  As I stated in a response to one of my readers, As Christians, everything that we do should be done for God's glory, to glorify Him. When we glorify God, we are worshiping Him. Worship does not happen only at church with our Bibles open hearing a sermon, or doing a Bible study, or singing songs, but all of life is worship, or should be.

    We are commanded in the Bible to pray without ceasing. Prayer is our primary means of communicating with God. If we are communicating with God, we are worshiping Him. So, we should worship God without ceasing.

    As we are to be constantly in communion with God, and we are doing everything to His glory, then even as we have sex, it should be done to His glory,to glorify Him. It should be done as worship...

    Scripture calls a husband to "rejoice" in his wife and to be "exhilarated" with her love. Rejoice is an interesting word because it is the same word that Paul uses when he calls us to "rejoice in the Lord always"...Jesus told us that we serve God by serving others so also we "rejoice" in God by "rejoicing" in our spouses. We serve God by serving our spouse. We please God by pleasing our spouse.

    Money

    Finances boil down to one word: communication.  As long as husbands and wives are open and honest with each other in this, and all other areas for that matter, then there will be no problems.  As long as all purchases are done with the consent of both partners, then there will be no surprises when the bills come due.  And if you can keep out of debt, you will be even better off.

    Closing thoughts

    Marriage is supposed to be a beautiful thing.  You are supposed to be happy with the one that you marry.  You are supposed to love them with all of your heart and to stay with them in all times, good and bad.  There very well may be rough patches in your relationship with your spouse, but these are no reason to just up and leave.  If your relationship is grounded in love and mutual submission; if there remain open lines of communication; if each partner is seeking the pleasure of his or her beloved, then your marriage will last.  The world may say your nuts, and other Christians may think your relationship is backwards (after all, men submitting to women, or even mutual submission for that matter, is not popular among Christians steeped in tradition rather than Scripture), but if you are doing what God has called you to do, then you will be blessed with the most beautiful relationship of your life.

Sunday, 31 August 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Book 5)
    By J. K. Rowling, Mary GrandPré
    see related

    The Good Marriage: Money Can't Buy Me Love

    It has been said that money and finances are spoken of over 800 times within the Christian Scriptures.  But, if you take time to read those Scriptures, how many of them speak of money within the context of marriage?  As far as I can tell, none.  There are many wonderful general principles presented in those passages, but it is sometimes hard or impossible to put some of those ideas into practice in a marriage relationship.

    Despite this fact, though, I think there is an example set for us within Scripture for how money should be handled in marriage, and that example is set forth within the early church.

    Acts and money

    All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. (Acts 2:44-45 TNIV)

    The best example of how money was treated in the early church is found at the very inception of the church.  The people lived together, ate together, and worshiped together.  But, they did so in community.  These "believers were together and had everything in common."

    In marriage, we must first recognize that the couple is together and, in a sense, has all things in common.  This is not to say that their identities bleed together and all sense of self is lost in the sense of the other.  Individuality still stands strong, but, when it comes to things like possessions, ownership becomes sort of a moot point.  "What's mine is yours and what's yours is mine."  Not only does the married couple move in together, but they share common possessions.  One couch, one recliner, one TV, one computer, one dinner table, one bed.

    The thing to realize about money and marriage is that whatever, for example, the man brings in monetarily, it becomes the woman's as well.  The money is used to pay household bills, put food on the table, and provide for any other expenses may arise.  It becomes hard for the wife to say she wants such and such and for the husband to say he wants this, that, and the other because they must take into account what combined needs are present in the relationship.

    This is one of the reasons that finances are one of the biggest reasons for marital fallout.  One or the other partner (or both in some instances) spends money in an inappropriate manner and leaves the relationship without something.  As the strain of debt strangles one partner, it strangles the relationship as well and things fall apart.

    At this juncture, some would say that this is why couples should start saving money right off the bat.  But, sometimes, this is not so easily applied.  Sometimes a couple may be completely responsible with their finances but come out only having just enough to barely get by.  In these cases, saving is sometimes impossible.  So I propose a better idea (not to belittle the importance of saving, of course).

    A better means of heading off any financial disputes is to do so before they even occur.  Communication is key when it comes to finances.  As silly as it may sound, every purchase should be discussed prior to making it.  And, if a surprise is in store, it must be done only if there are the funds available to do so without adding further strain.  It's as simple as that.  When you go grocery shopping, stick to the list and only make extra purchases if they can be afforded after the list is complete.  If one partner wants a book or a movie, make sure the money is available before purchasing it.

    I also believe that finances must be, when possible, done jointly.  Checkbooks must be balanced, groceries purchased, and bills paid openly and together.  There should be no secrets and, when possible, both partners must know everything that is going on financially. 

    Money may not be able to make you happy, but managing it well can aid in keeping things from going sour.

Saturday, 30 August 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Jesus for President: Politics for Ordinary Radicals
    By Shane Claiborne, Chris Haw
    see related

    Responding to a friend

    A friend of mine was asking some questions and speaking of his desire to do what God says and speaking of his seeming lack of actual desire to do it, and I posted a response that seemed more directed at my own life than his...so I am going to share it here because maybe there is someone else who needs to hear it too...

    Working in a hospital environment like I do tends to make me sort of calloused to the needs of others. Every single day, I go to my dead-end job of parking people's cars, and every day I see people who's loved ones are dying or who's children are suffering from various cancers or men who can no longer speak and have one of those little electronic voice boxes that makes them sound like that robot at the beginning of the Beastie Boys song "Intergalactic," and, more often than not, I don't give a damn. I want to care, but more often than not, I just don't.

    Or at least that is what I used to think.

    For the summer, we hired on a 20 year old college student who was the daughter of one of the laziest workers we have. But this girl had a heart bigger than she could handle. A 16 year old boy was in a car accident and was on life support. The family came every day for two weeks and she built a relationship with them. When the boy died, she could not recompose herself and dry her tears all day. A man came in with a different one of his five daughters every day due to some internal problems. They were doing tests and prepping him for surgery. The doctors opened him up, and found his insides consumed with a cancer the tests couldn't detect. He was given two weeks. We never saw him again. She cried.

    I think most Christians are insulated from the world around them in much the same way as non-Christians. Cancer, hunger, poverty kill most people inside, so we put up buffers between us and those problems and choose, rather, to debate politics and theology and who the best baseball team is. And, in an ironic twist, we watch reality TV to escape reality.

    Maybe I am saying all of this more for myself than for you, but we minister unto the world by living as Jesus did. And we can, and should, do this in our middle-class and dead-end jobs. We can have as many Bible studies and prayer groups and worship sessions and Sunday services and Christian books as we want, but if that doesn't translate into (even flawed) actions, then it is all a waste and is worthy of being flushed with the rest of our daily crap. The Prophets stated it, in God's Name, as a question: Why do you call Me "Lord, Lord" but don't do what I tell you?

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

Saturday, 23 August 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Book 5)
    By J. K. Rowling, Mary GrandPré
    see related

    The Good Marriage: Sex

    As I stated last time, today, we are going to take our philosophy of sex and look at it in more practical terms.  I am willing to say that it is downright impossible to speak of sex only in theory.  It must be talked about in real, literal terms. 

    As the logo to the left suggests, this post is intended for mature audiences only.  In particular, it is intended to be read by people in serious relationships that are on their way to becoming marriages and for those who are already married.  Some things here you may already know, other things may be new.  But I want us to understand the practical implications of a Christian philosophy of sex.

    The physical and spiritual, together as one

    As I stated previously, sex is indeed spiritual.  But how can this be?  How can something like sex bring us closer to God?

    In itself, foreplay, intercourse, and orgasm are nothing more than physical acts that come and go.  Once done they are done.  The spiritual is found in the enjoyment of the event.  When we enjoy the good things that God has given us, we are showing our appreciation to Him for them.  Simply the fact that you are finding pleasure in your beloved is enough.  When sex is used as intended, God is pleased, man is pleased, and woman is pleased.

    And this is really the point of sex.  It is not about making babies and filling the earth and subduing it, although that is one of the outcomes of intercourse.  It is more about finding your joy in the joy of your beloved.  Even the ancients understood this.

    (Man) Your lips are like a scarlet ribbon;
           your mouth is lovely.
           Your temples behind your veil
           are like the halves of a pomegranate.
    Your neck is like the tower of David,
           built with elegance;
           on it hang a thousand shields,
           all of them shields of warriors.
    Your two breasts are like two fawns,
           like twin fawns of a gazelle
           that browse among the lilies.
    Until the day breaks
           and the shadows flee,
           I will go to the mountain of myrrh
           and to the hill of incense.
    All beautiful you are, my darling;
           there is no flaw in you...

    (Woman) May the wine go straight to my lover,
           flowing gently over lips and teeth.
    I belong to my lover,
           and his desire is for me.
    Come, my lover, let us go to the countryside,
           let us spend the night in the villages.
           Let us go early to the vineyards
           to see if the vines have budded,
           if their blossoms have opened,
           and if the pomegranates are in bloom—
           there I will give you my love.
    (Song of Solomon 4:3-7; 7:9b-11 NIV)

    That being said, how does one find this joy?  How does one acquire a sex life with one's spouse that is beautiful and glorifying to God?

    Men, it starts with us.  For many marriages, sex is understood as nothing more than a marital right.  And it is treated as such.  Sex, if it even happens, is about pleasing the man and making some babies.  There is nothing really beautiful about it.  And, more often than not, women are left unsatisfied. 

    This is why it begins with us.  We have a responsibility to our wives to help them find their joy in us as their husbands.  We are to seek out what it is that pleases them and do everything in our power to do that for them. 

    As a side result of the wife being satisfied, we as the husbands will also be satisfied. 

    And as love and joy are found by both partners, enjoyment increases and the picture of God as separate yet one can be more fully recognized.  As we enjoy sex with our spouses, we are also worshiping God for worship is not limited to singing songs, reading the Bible, and praying, but also in enjoying all the good things that He has given us in life.

    As a result of enjoying sex, the sex life actually improves as well. As we worship God with our bodies in this way, our relationship deepens with our spouse.  This is why sex is so important to a healthy marriage.  It is in these intimate times that we learn more about each other.

    When it becomes dull

    There almost inevitably will come a time, even if it is just one day in a hundred, when simply laying together and making love will seem dull.  These are the times when the sex life of a marriage begins to fall by the wayside.  And, as a further result, sometimes, the rest of the marriage as well.  What do you do?  How do you maintain a sex life that is pleasurable and glorifying to God?

    Trying new positions is always an option.  There is absolutely no Scriptural support for the idea that man must always be on top.  In fact, what position is used is nowhere to be found in the Bible at all.  These details are left up to the individuals in the relationship.  Outside of Christianity, though, much has been said regarding this aspect of sexuality.

    Hindu's have a work called the Kama Sutra.  In this work, sex is spoken of as a spiritual matter and what position one uses lends itself to different connections with the Divine.  I won't go that far, but I do believe that a different position every once in a while can keep things interesting enough as to maintain a joyous and God-glorifying sex life.

    In the end

    Sex is vitally important to a healthy marriage.  Regardless of whether or not you believe that having sex is an act of worship, you cannot over-estimate the important role that sex plays in a healthy marriage.  Each aspect of a healthy sex life, from foreplay to orgasm, is designed to magnify pleasure and make the marriage relationship that much more intimate.  And in the end, a healthy sex life does indeed glorify God, whether you want to admit it or not.

Monday, 11 August 2008

  • Currently Watching
    Super High Me (Conservative Art)
    By Douglas Benson
    see related

    The Good Marriage: Toward a Philosophy of Sex

    Of all the topics that can be discussed when speaking of marriage, sex is the one most controversial.  Within American Christianity, you have two major extremes.  On the one hand, you have the group that never speaks of it and leaves the subject veiled in mystery until the husband and wife share a bed for the first time on their honeymoon.  On the other hand, you have the group that challenges husbands and wives to have sex for 30 days straight and speaks so loudly of it that it turns the whole thing into a satirical joke.  Both of these extremes are wrong.  So, before we speak practically about sex and what it has to do with marriage, I would like to take a few moments and see if we can't begin to move toward a healthy philosophy of sex.

    From as early as the Old Testament, and no doubt long before that, writers have sought to put into writing the complexities of human sexuality.  This is no easy task.  From the Song of Solomon's poetic song found in the Christian Bible to the Kama Sutra in Sanskrit to the erotic literature of the modern West, sex is a much explored topic.  But outside of the Kama Sutra and modern sexual counseling works, very little is said regarding a philosophy of sex.  This is doubly true of Christianity.

    But sex is one of the most important aspects of a healthy marriage.  In fact, if you look at unhealthy marriages, one of the first things to cease, possibly even before communication, is sex.  Once sex is removed, everything else seems to fall apart.

    This is not to say that there aren't exceptions and this is not saying that sex is the most important aspect to a healthy marriage.  But sex is important.  Vitally so.

    The most intimate that two people can be together is for one to be inside another.  Deep friendships are built when two people have deep conversations about what is really going on inside.  How much deeper does this go when two people actually, literally, physically enter one another?  To lessen the impact that this has on two people is to not take sex seriously.

    The film Brokeback Mountain gives a perfect illustration.

    Enis and Jack are two sheep herders in a small town in the mountains.  They are both given a job herding the same man's sheep for the summer months.  As they converse and become friends, they run out of ways to express their deep friendship. This is further a challenge considering the era in which they live.  In the late 1950's and early 1960's, it was not socially acceptable for two men to be intimate in any manner.  In seemingly a last ditch effort to express their love for each other, they have sex and, when they seperate at the end of the summer, they are unable ever to forget each other.  It ruins their marriages and ends in one of them being brutally murdered.

    Sex truly is a powerful thing.

    So what do we do with something so powerful?  Do we do as some have done and never touch it?  Or do we go the other way and talk about it with reckless abandon?  The answer lies in the middle.

    First, sex must be discussed, I believe, primarily within the context of marriage.  I believe that God intends for humankind to be monogamus.  After all, fornication is condemned many times over in the Bible.  And I believe that God intends for sex to be saved for marriage.

    That being said, I do not believe it sin for an engaged couple to make love prior to their ceremony.  They are betrothed to each other, and if they are truly unable to wait, they are free to do as they believe right for them.  Different relationships progress differently, and to force them all to fit into one ideal is simply unrealistic.  But note what this means: once they have had sex, in God's eyes they are married, and they must live in the reality of the decision that they have made. 

    Secondly, just because sex is intended for marriage, that does not mean that we are to be silent about it in public settings.  Sex is all around us.  It sells.  It shocks.  It arouses.  And all of this happens all around us.  For the Church to be silent about sex is like ignoring a bleeding man in your living room: it is foolishness.

    So, what is a good Christian philosophy of human sexuality?  I will lay out what I believe it to be in bullet-point form:
    • God intends for sex to be reserved for men and women who are betrothed to be married.
    • This was God's design for sex.  It was to be a way for humankind to more fully express His image in themselves as seperate yet one.
    • Husbands and wives are to indulge each other sexually and not deny each other except by mutual agreement.  Remember: husbands and wives are equal in their relationship.  The Godlen rule applies in bed.
    • Sex is indeed spiritual, as Eastern religions proclaim.  It is not intended only for the making of babies, but also as a means of worshipping God.
    Today, we have briefly looked at sex from a more philosophical perspective.  But this is nearly impossible to do.  Sex is a topic best explored practically, which is exactly what we will do next.  As a pre-warning: the next post in this series contains explicit material and is intended for mature readers only.

Tuesday, 05 August 2008

  • Currently Watching
    He Was a Quiet Man
    By William H. Macy, Christian Slater, David Wells, Elisha Cuthbert, Greg Baker
    see related

    The Good Marriage: Gender Roles

    The particularity of each life is obscured by reductionizing abstractions.  Life leaks out of us as we find ourselves treated as objects, roles, images, economic potential, commodities, consumers. - Eugene Peterson

    One of the most divisive issues within the Christian church here in America is the issue of gender.  On the one hand, you have the group called the Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, which states that its aim is "to set forth the teachings of the Bible about the complementary differences between men and women, created equally in the image of God, because these teachings are essential for obedience to Scripture and for the health of the family and the church."  Among these ideas is that men are to be the dominant partner in marriage and women are to be submissive to their husbands. 

    On the other hand, you have the group Christians for Biblical Equality, which which believes "that the Bible, properly interpreted, teaches the fundamental equality of men and women."  This group would say that husbands and wives are to work together in marriage equally, and not in a hierarchical structure.

    Whatever your personal view of all of this is, I want us to look at what the Bible says.  Set aside what you believe the Bible says and walk with me through the Scriptures as we discuss what they say about gender roles in a marriage relationship.

    The Beginning

    The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."...So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.  The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man."  For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh. (Genesis 2:18, 21-24 TNIV)

    From the beginning, God has desired for His creation to be like Him.  When He made humankind in His image, I believe that He made them to be in relationship with themselves as He is in relationship with Himself.  I think this might be part of what is meant when the Bible says, in Genesis 1, that God made us in His image and that He, "Created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them" (Genesis 1:21 TNIV).  He created them be one in kind and substance, but different in their functioning within creation.

    But, despite their different "functions" within creation, even when Moses was penning Genesis, he seemed to have an understanding that men and women were to be more equal than not.  Just as God took woman from man, so man returns to woman.  Woman would not exist had man not existed, but neither will men exist if not for women. Because woman was taken from man, that is why man leaves home and goes back in to woman in marriage.

    God's plan from the very beginning was that humankind would be equal with each other.  But something messed this plan up.  People chose to do their own thing and go their own way and, as a result, what God had brought together, humankind had ripped apart. What was once harmony was now discord.  Where there once understanding and mutual respect, injustice now stood.

    To the woman [God] said, "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband [to rule over him], and he will rule over you." (Genesis 3:16 TNIV)

    The End

    Thousands of years pass, and women are dragged through the dirt.  Inequality becomes the norm.  Women are made to bear the brunt of the guilt for abuse, sexual neglect, and adultery.  If a woman is raped, she is forced to continue in her suffering by being forced to marry her rapist.  But this is not God's plan, and despite these things being commanded in the Law, I do not believe that they are God's will for His people. 

    Enter Jesus.

    Jesus comes and shows us exactly what God is like.  He shows compassion to those who had been marginalized by His own people and treats them with respect.  He allows women to learn from Him just as any man would.  He is followed by women, and women are even referred to as His disciples.  And this doesn't stop when Jesus dies.  Women hold a prominent place in the early church.  They are named by name.  The business woman Lydia.  Paul mentions Phoebe, a deacon; Priscilla and Aquila, Paul's co-workers; Mary; Andronicus and Junia, possibly a married couple, and both are referred to as apostles; Tryphena and Tryphosa; Persis.

    God's plan is on it's way to being re-established, His kingdom reinstated, and Paul is at the forefront. He talks about proper marital sexuality, saying that not only does the wife's body belong to her husband, but the husband's body equally belongs to his wife.  They are not to deny "each other."  But then he says something, in Ephesians, that is grossly misinterpreted, and has been for centuries.

    Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. (Ephesians 5:22 TNIV)

    The church, centuries after these words were written, latches on to this admonition to keep women in control.  Free-thinking women are called "witches" and are burned and tortured.  But this is not what Paul meant, and it is not God's plan.  (And wives submitting to asshole, abusive husbands is not what God wants for His people, either.)  And His own Scriptures make this clear.  Context is key.

    Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. After all, people have never hated their own bodies, but they feed and care for them, just as Christ does the church— for we are members of his body. "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh." This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband. (Ephesians 5:21-33 TNIV)

    It starts with a general admonition to all people to submit to each other.  Then he tells wives to submit to their husbands.  And I can hear the applause as the letter is read.  Men high-fiving each other and laughing as they nudge their wives in the ribs and whisper, "See?  I told ya he was one of us!"  But then he does something so subversive that it shocks even the sensibilities of a culture as accepting of women's rights as our's.  He tells husbands to love their wives as Jesus did the church.  He tells the husband to "give himself up for her."

    The heiarchy is turned upside down.  No.  Better.  It is shattered.  As if Jesus saying that rulers lording over those under them is not to be so is not enough, Paul goes so far as to say that wives should serve their husbands AND husbands should serive their wives.  Wives should submit, but husbands should submit as well.  Mutual submission.

    Paul calls for a return to God's original plan: for us to be in God's image.  And Marriage is supposedto be that image.  Men in equal relationship with women.  Different in "function", just like the Father, Son, and Spirit all "function" differently as their own aspects of God come forth, but of the same substance. Men and women are not fundamentally different, they are fundamentally the same.  Whether from dirt or flesh and bone, men and women are, at their cores, the same.  They come from the same substance and originate from the same Creator.

    The husband and wife should "flesh" this out in their relationship with each other.  Wives should submit to their husbands as they do to God, but husbands should submit to their wives as God did to His church: He became like her, served her, and died for her.  If a husband is not doing this, then he has no right or business complaining when his wife won't submit to him.

    I could go on and on, and I really want to.  Suffice it to say that when men and women are viewed as fundamentally different, and roles are imposed; when husbands are viewed as husbands and wives as wives, rather than as the individual human beings that they are, harmony is broken.  And when harmony is broken, whether between humankind and God, or even between men and women, the result is death.

Saturday, 02 August 2008

  • Currently Watching
    The Royal Tenenbaums (The Criterion Collection)
    By Owen Wilson, Ben Stiller, Luke Wilson, Gene Hackman, Gwyneth Paltrow
    see related

    The Good Marriage: Foundations in Scripture

    History is ripe with pictures and stories of marriage and weddings.  And, while history can be a wonderful teacher, it is too broad a picture for a discussion on what makes for a good, strong marriage.  Plus, history is purely the human story, and since it is the human story, it is also full of error and misunderstanding.  Human tradition sometimes contradicts common sense and often times becomes irrelevant as cultures evolve over time.

    But there is one thing has not changed in thousands of years, and that is religious texts.  For the sake of our discussion, since most of my readers are Christians, I am going to limit my discussion of marriage within scriptures to the Christian Bible.  At the end of this post, though, I will link to some articles about marriage within some other religious contexts for the sake of my non-Christian readers and for some further reflection by those readers who are Christians.

    Marriage in the Old Testament

    Marriage in the Old Testament is an interesting topic.  It is interesting because there is precious little pertaining to marriage within that context. 

    Marriage in the OT was based in a mentality toward women that was less than generous.  Women were viewed as property, much like cattle, to be bought and sold on the market.  When a man wanted to marry a woman, he was required to make an arrangement with the girl's father to pay a certain price by a certain time.  In the time leading up to his payment, the man would go and build an addition on to his own parents' house for his new family to move in to.  And when he was finished, he would show up at his betrothed's home and take her away.  There would be a celebration, but only after he had had sex with her.  After the first time, he would check the sheets for blood, thought at the time to be a sign of her virginity.  If there were blood, he would emerge and the party would begin.  The story was much different if there were no blood.

    If there were no blood, she was thought to have been damaged goods.  She was not a virgin and was taken immediately to the temple.  At the temple, she would be given a concoction that would, if she were not a virgin, cause her to become deathly ill and render her barren, as well as aborting any child that may be growing in her.  If it were proven that she were a virgin, her taking of the concoction would have no effect whatsoever and the husband would pay a price for having defamed his bride's family. 

    Any other discussion of marriage within the OT is limited to using it as imagery for God and His relationship with Israel.  This does say something about marriage in this context, though.  There was obviously something beautiful about it.  The tradition and rituals and the culture, while lacking in generosity toward women, were apparently not the general way that things were done.  Could it be that the early Israelites did things a little differently from the methods prescribed in the Law?

    Marriage in the New Testament

    Marriage within the New Testament is a little more spelled out. Thousands of years of human history taught Jews and early Christians some guiding principles for how to live in relationship with their spouses.  While not as generous toward women as our culture is, there seems to be a general change in attitude toward women and men, at least within a marital context.

    Within the NT, there seems to be an attitude that men should have deep respect for women.  Men were called upon to treat their wives with respect and as fellow heirs of salvation (1 Peter 3:7), they are commanded to love their wives in the same way Jesus did the church (Ephesians 5:25), and they are told not to deny them sexual satisfaction (1 Corinthians 7:3-5).  Prostitution is condemned and fidelity to one's spouse is praised. 

    But even in this, the NT is sadly incomplete in relation to what makes a marriage strong.  There is no set-in-stone idea pertaining to this.  Principles can be deduced and attitudes can be influenced, but there is not chapter and verse stating what makes a marriage strong.  This is because the Biblical authors, in both the Old and New Testaments, knew that each relationship is as different from the next as two people are different from each other.  And that is part of what makes, or should make, marriage so beautiful. 

    Article about marriage from other Religious contexts

    Love and Marriage: Zen Buddhist Reflections

    The Jewish Laws of Marriage

    Islamic Sexual Morality

    Taoism and the Transformation of Marriage

    Hindu Marriage

    Wedding the Atheist Way

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]